Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Surgery Center of Viera, LLC v. United Launch Alliance LLC, 6:17-cv-755-Orl-40DCI. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180215g35 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER PAUL G. BYRON , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on Defendant Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Services, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 41) filed on November 27, 2017 and Defendants, United Launch Alliance, LLC, the United Launch Alliance Health & Welfare Benefits Plan for Active Employees, and ULA Administrative Committees' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 45) filed on December 11, 201
More

ORDER

This cause is before the Court on Defendant Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Services, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 41) filed on November 27, 2017 and Defendants, United Launch Alliance, LLC, the United Launch Alliance Health & Welfare Benefits Plan for Active Employees, and ULA Administrative Committees' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 45) filed on December 11, 2017. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motions be granted.

After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed1, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation.

Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation filed January 31, 2018 (Doc. 56), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.

2. Defendant Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Services, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 41) is GRANTED.

3. Defendants, United Launch Alliance, LLC, the United Launch Alliance Health & Welfare Benefits Plan for Active Employees, and ULA Administrative Committees' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 45) is GRANTED.

4. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 33) is DISMISSED with prejudice.

5. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Copies were mailed to one of Plaintiff's counsel, Thomas Loucks, however, an additional three days under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(e) is not necessary as Plaintiff's remaining counsel received electronic notice.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer