Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Borda, 2:17-cr-88-FtM-29CM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180306h48 Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER CAROL MIRANDO , Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon review of Defendant's Motion for Authorization for Additional Sums for Translator (Doc. 98) filed on March 1, 2018. Defendant has used the services of Leon C. Fontova as an interpreter and seeks the Court to approve an additional $750.00 to further use Mr. Fontana's services because Defendant already expended $800.00 for Mr. Fontana's services, which is the statutory maximum amount Defendant's counsel may use
More

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court upon review of Defendant's Motion for Authorization for Additional Sums for Translator (Doc. 98) filed on March 1, 2018. Defendant has used the services of Leon C. Fontova as an interpreter and seeks the Court to approve an additional $750.00 to further use Mr. Fontana's services because Defendant already expended $800.00 for Mr. Fontana's services, which is the statutory maximum amount Defendant's counsel may use without the Court's prior authorization. Doc. 98 at 1-2; see 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e)(2)(A).1

For services other than counsel, the Criminal Justice Act ("CJA") provides, in relevant part:

Counsel for a person who is financially unable to obtain investigative, expert, or other services necessary for adequate representation may request them in an ex parte application. Upon finding, after appropriate inquiry in an ex parte proceeding, that the services are necessary and that the person is financially unable to obtain them, the court, or the United States magistrate judge if the services are required in connection with a matter over which he has jurisdiction, shall authorize counsel to obtain the services.

18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e)(1). "Compensation to be paid to a person for services rendered by him to a person under this subsection, or to be paid to an organization for services rendered by an employee thereof, shall not exceed $2,400, exclusive of reimbursement for expenses reasonably incurred . . ." unless otherwise certified by the Court, as provided therein. 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e)(3). In order to authorize services under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e), the defendant must successfully demonstrate that (1) he is financially unable to obtain such services, and (2) such services are "necessary for adequate representation." United States v. Hernandez, 743 F.3d 812, 815 (11th Cir. 2014).

This Court previously determined Defendant is financially qualified for the appointment of CJA counsel. Doc. 8. There is no evidence before the Court that Defendant's financial circumstances have changed. The Court therefore finds he is financially unable to obtain interpreter services. Thus, the Court finds that because Defendant is financially unable to obtain interpreter services, and the interpreter services are necessary for adequate representation, the request for funds for $750.00 is due to be granted.

ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby

ORDERED:

Defendant's Motion for Authorization for Additional Sums for Translator (Doc. 98) is GRANTED. Defendant shall be granted up to an additional $750.00 to use for interpreter services pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e)(1).

FootNotes


1. The statute states, "[c]ounsel appointed under this section may obtain, subject to later review, investigative, expert, and other services without prior authorization if necessary for adequate representation. Except as provided in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, the total cost of services obtained without prior authorization may not exceed $800 and expenses reasonably incurred." 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e)(2)(A).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer