Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Stanback, 8:17-cr-368-T-17JSS. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180312475 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF FORFEITURE ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH , District Judge . The defendant pleaded guilty to Count Three of the Indictment which charges her with theft of government funds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 641, and the United States has established that the defendant obtained $7,159.00 in proceeds as a result of the offense. The United States moves under 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. 2461(c), and Rule 32.2(b)(2), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to forfeit the $7,159.00. The mot
More

ORDER OF FORFEITURE

The defendant pleaded guilty to Count Three of the Indictment which charges her with theft of government funds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641, and the United States has established that the defendant obtained $7,159.00 in proceeds as a result of the offense.

The United States moves under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and Rule 32.2(b)(2), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to forfeit the $7,159.00. The motion is GRANTED. The United States is entitled to forfeit the $7,159.00 in proceeds the defendant obtained.

Because the $7,159.00 in proceeds was dissipated by the defendant, the United States may seek, as a substitute asset, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), forfeiture of any of the defendant's property up to the value of $7,159.00. Jurisdiction is retained to enter any order necessary for the forfeiture and disposition of any substitute asset and to address any third-party claim.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer