Turruelle v. Allied Paver Systems, LLC, 2:18-cv-168-FtM-38MRM. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20180420927
Filed: Apr. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' Joint Notice of No Compromise. (Doc. 13). Plaintiffs Yoan Llorca Turruelle and Rangel Hernandez Medina sued Defendants Allied Paver Systems, LCC and Donald C. Montroy last month for unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). (Doc. 1). The parties have since settled this suit in full, without comprise, and separately from attorney's fees and costs. (Doc. 30). The Court thus do
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' Joint Notice of No Compromise. (Doc. 13). Plaintiffs Yoan Llorca Turruelle and Rangel Hernandez Medina sued Defendants Allied Paver Systems, LCC and Donald C. Montroy last month for unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). (Doc. 1). The parties have since settled this suit in full, without comprise, and separately from attorney's fees and costs. (Doc. 30). The Court thus doe..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the parties' Joint Notice of No Compromise. (Doc. 13). Plaintiffs Yoan Llorca Turruelle and Rangel Hernandez Medina sued Defendants Allied Paver Systems, LCC and Donald C. Montroy last month for unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). (Doc. 1). The parties have since settled this suit in full, without comprise, and separately from attorney's fees and costs. (Doc. 30). The Court thus does not need to review and approve the settlement for fairness. See Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir. 1982); King v. My Online Neighborhood, Inc., No. 6:06-cv-435-Orl-22JGG, 2007 WL 737575, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 2007) ("Where the employer offers the plaintiff full compensation on his FLSA claim, no compromise is involved and judicial approval is not required." (citation omitted)). Plaintiffs also have voluntarily agreed to dismissed their case with prejudice. (Doc. 11). The Court thus dismisses this case with prejudice.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
(1) The above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
(2) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all pending deadlines and motions, and close the file.
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source: Leagle
