Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DiPolo v. Graham, 3:17-cv-800-J-32JBT. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180424958 Visitors: 21
Filed: Apr. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN , District Judge . This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss this Action without Prejudice (Doc. 17). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) permits a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss an action after an answer has been filed "only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper." Defendant Joseph Patrick Graham, Jr. filed an answer in this case. (Doc. 4). However, Plaintiff has been unable to serve the other two defendants. (Doc. 17
More

ORDER

This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss this Action without Prejudice (Doc. 17). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) permits a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss an action after an answer has been filed "only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper." Defendant Joseph Patrick Graham, Jr. filed an answer in this case. (Doc. 4). However, Plaintiff has been unable to serve the other two defendants. (Doc. 17). As two defendants have yet to be served and the appearing Defendant does not oppose dismissal without prejudice, the Court finds such dismissal appropriate. See Arias v. Cameron, 776 F.3d 1262, 1268 (11th Cir. 2015) ("[A] a motion for voluntary dismissal should be granted unless the defendant will suffer clear legal prejudice other than the mere prospect of a second lawsuit.").

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. Motion to Dismiss this Action without Prejudice (Doc. 17) is GRANTED.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

3. The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and then close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer