U.S. v. George, 3:17-cr-55-J-32MCR. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20180530c02
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 29, 2018
Latest Update: May 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN , District Judge . This case is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 29, (Doc. 67). At the close of the evidence at trial, the Court denied Defendant's Rule 29 motion for judgment of acquittal (Doc. 64 at 130). Post-trial, Defendant makes the same motion. Upon review of the motion and the government's response, (Doc. 73), it is hereby ORDERED: Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 29 (Doc. 67)
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN , District Judge . This case is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 29, (Doc. 67). At the close of the evidence at trial, the Court denied Defendant's Rule 29 motion for judgment of acquittal (Doc. 64 at 130). Post-trial, Defendant makes the same motion. Upon review of the motion and the government's response, (Doc. 73), it is hereby ORDERED: Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 29 (Doc. 67) ..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 29, (Doc. 67). At the close of the evidence at trial, the Court denied Defendant's Rule 29 motion for judgment of acquittal (Doc. 64 at 130). Post-trial, Defendant makes the same motion. Upon review of the motion and the government's response, (Doc. 73), it is hereby
ORDERED:
Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 29 (Doc. 67) is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle