204 6th St LLC v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, 2:18-cv-235-FtM-38CM. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20180604783
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) filed on May 7, 2018. Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. 18) on May 30, 2018. Because an amended pleading supersedes an original, motions directed at the superseded pleading are moot. See Malowney v. Fed. Collection Deposit Grp., 193 F.3d 1342 , 1345 n.1 (11th Cir. 1999) ("An amended complaint supersedes an original complaint."). Accordingly, it is now
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) filed on May 7, 2018. Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. 18) on May 30, 2018. Because an amended pleading supersedes an original, motions directed at the superseded pleading are moot. See Malowney v. Fed. Collection Deposit Grp., 193 F.3d 1342 , 1345 n.1 (11th Cir. 1999) ("An amended complaint supersedes an original complaint."). Accordingly, it is now ..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) filed on May 7, 2018. Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. 18) on May 30, 2018. Because an amended pleading supersedes an original, motions directed at the superseded pleading are moot. See Malowney v. Fed. Collection Deposit Grp., 193 F.3d 1342, 1345 n.1 (11th Cir. 1999) ("An amended complaint supersedes an original complaint.").
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is DENIED as MOOT.
DONE and OREDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source: Leagle
