Layton v. Percepta, LLC, 6:17-cv-1488-Orl-41DCI. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20180628b91
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Second Renewed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint to Add an Additional Party ("Motion," Doc. 42). United States Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 44), recommending that the Court deny the Motion. After a de novo review of the record, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation. It is therefore
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Second Renewed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint to Add an Additional Party ("Motion," Doc. 42). United States Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 44), recommending that the Court deny the Motion. After a de novo review of the record, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation. It is therefore ..
More
ORDER
CARLOS E. MENDOZA, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Second Renewed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint to Add an Additional Party ("Motion," Doc. 42). United States Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 44), recommending that the Court deny the Motion.
After a de novo review of the record, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation. It is therefore ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 44) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. Plaintiff's Second Renewed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint to Add an Additional Party (Doc. 42) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
