ORDER1

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Sila Nunez's Motion for Sentence Reduction (Doc. 95) and the Government's response in opposition (Doc. 98). For the following reasons, the Court denies Nunez's motion.

The Court sentenced Nunez on March 19, 2018, to eighty-seven months imprisonment for conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. (Doc. 92). She now requests the Court reduce her sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), Amendment 782, and Hughes v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 1765 (2018). A court may modify a defendant's term of imprisonment if the defendant was sentenced based on a sentencing range that the Sentencing Commission subsequently lowered. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Here, Nunez is not eligible for a sentence reduction because the Court sentenced her under the 2016 Guidelines Manual that incorporated Amendment 782. Nunez has already received Amendment 782's benefit when the Court sentenced her in March. See, e.g., United States v. Glover, 686 F.3d 1203, 1206 (11th Cir. 2012) ("[A] court cannot use an amendment to reduce a sentence in a particular case unless that amendment actually lowers the guidelines range in that case."). And because the Court so recently sentenced Nunez with Amendment 782 applying, the Hughes case does not help her motion. The Court, therefore, denies Nunez's motion for a sentence reduction.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

Defendant Sila Nunez's Motion for Sentence Reduction (Doc. 95) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.