Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Robinson v. National Credit Systems, Inc., 2:17-cv-386-FtM-38CM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180723786 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jul. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Deshawn Robinson and Diandra Decrescenzo's Notice of Acceptance of Offer of Judgment (Doc. 75). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 provides that At least 14 days before the date set for trial, a party defending against a claim may serve on an opposing party an offer to allow judgment on specified terms, with the costs then accrued. If, within 14 days after being served, the opposing party s
More

ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Deshawn Robinson and Diandra Decrescenzo's Notice of Acceptance of Offer of Judgment (Doc. 75). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 provides that

At least 14 days before the date set for trial, a party defending against a claim may serve on an opposing party an offer to allow judgment on specified terms, with the costs then accrued. If, within 14 days after being served, the opposing party serves written notice accepting the offer, either party may then file the offer and notice of acceptance, plus proof of service. The clerk must then enter judgment.

Here, the Plaintiffs accepted an offer of judgment from Defendant National Credit Systems, Inc. (Doc. 75). Because Plaintiffs properly accepted the Offer, judgment must be entered.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to dismiss this action with prejudice, enter judgment accordingly, terminate and pending motions, and close this case.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer