Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Short v. Immokalee Water & Sewage District, 2:18-cv-124-FtM-99CM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180824d50 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff John Short's Motion to Vacate Endorsed Order Granting Defendant Immokalee Water & Sewage District's Motion to File Reply Brief. (Doc. 40). The Middle District of Florida's Local Rules give the Court discretion to allow a party to file a reply brief. Local Rule 3.01(c). Here, the Court found good cause for Immokalee Water to file a reply to Short's response to the motion to dismiss. In granting Immokalee Water
More

ORDER1

Before the Court is Plaintiff John Short's Motion to Vacate Endorsed Order Granting Defendant Immokalee Water & Sewage District's Motion to File Reply Brief. (Doc. 40). The Middle District of Florida's Local Rules give the Court discretion to allow a party to file a reply brief. Local Rule 3.01(c). Here, the Court found good cause for Immokalee Water to file a reply to Short's response to the motion to dismiss. In granting Immokalee Water a reply brief, the Court recognized that Short opposed such relief. And because of his opposition, the Court gave him leave to file a sur-reply of equal page length to Immokalee Water's reply. The Court thus has given no appearance of undue and unfair favoritism towards Immokalee Water's legal position.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

Plaintiff John Short's Motion to Vacate Endorsed Order Granting Defendant Immokalee Water & Sewage District's Motion to File Reply Brief (Doc. 40) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer