Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kullman v. Commissioner of Social Security, 8:17-cv-382-T-30AEP. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180829a09 Visitors: 26
Filed: Aug. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli (Dkt. 30). The Court notes that neither party filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections has elapsed. After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the opi
More

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli (Dkt. 30). The Court notes that neither party filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections has elapsed.

After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects.

ACCORDINGLY, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 30) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review.

2. The decision of the Defendant Commissioner is REVERSED AND REMANDED for an award of benefits.

3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Plaintiff.

4. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer