Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lacroix v. Lee County, 2:18-cv-143-FtM-38CM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180830b94 Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff Adam Lacroix's Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal of This Court's Order on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 52). The Court denied Lacroix's Motion for Preliminary Injunction on July 23, 2018 (Doc. 43), and Lacroix timely filed a Notice of Appeal (Doc. 48). Lacroix now seeks to stay proceedings until the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rules on his appeal. Lacroix's attorney c
More

ORDER1

Before the Court is Plaintiff Adam Lacroix's Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal of This Court's Order on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 52).

The Court denied Lacroix's Motion for Preliminary Injunction on July 23, 2018 (Doc. 43), and Lacroix timely filed a Notice of Appeal (Doc. 48). Lacroix now seeks to stay proceedings until the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rules on his appeal. Lacroix's attorney certifies that counsel for the Defendants have been consulted and that they do not object to a stay.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

Plaintiff Adam Lacroix's Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal of This Court's Order on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 52) is GRANTED.

1. All proceedings in this case are STAYED until the parties advise the Court that the interlocutory appeal has concluded and the stay should be lifted. The parties must notify the Court of such matters within five (5) days of the appeal concluding. 2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to add a stay flag to the case file.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer