Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Petro Welt Trading GES M.B.H. v. Brinkmann, 2:18-cv-597-FtM-38MRM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180926b10 Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. 7) and Defendants' Consent to Motion to Remand (Doc. 9). Plaintiffs sued Defendants in the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida. Defendants then removed the case to this Court. (Doc. 1). Plaintiffs now move to remand this action. (Doc. 7). Defendants consent to the remand. (Doc. 9). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: (1) Plaintiffs' Moti
More

ORDER1

Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. 7) and Defendants' Consent to Motion to Remand (Doc. 9). Plaintiffs sued Defendants in the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida. Defendants then removed the case to this Court. (Doc. 1). Plaintiffs now move to remand this action. (Doc. 7). Defendants consent to the remand. (Doc. 9).

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. 7) is GRANTED. (2) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to REMAND the case to the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida and to transmit a certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of that Court. (3) The Clerk is further DIRECTED to terminate all pending motions and deadlines and close the case.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer