Farris v. Metlife, Inc., 6:18-cv-278-Orl-41KRS. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20181012b51
Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 11) and Motion to Stay Timelines and Discovery (Doc. 12). Also before the Court is Plaintiff's Second Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 13). United States Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding submitted a Report and Recommendation ("R&R," Doc. 15), recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be granted, the Motion to Stay be denied as moot, and Plaintiff's
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 11) and Motion to Stay Timelines and Discovery (Doc. 12). Also before the Court is Plaintiff's Second Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 13). United States Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding submitted a Report and Recommendation ("R&R," Doc. 15), recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be granted, the Motion to Stay be denied as moot, and Plaintiff's ..
More
ORDER
CARLOS E. MENDOZA, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 11) and Motion to Stay Timelines and Discovery (Doc. 12). Also before the Court is Plaintiff's Second Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 13). United States Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding submitted a Report and Recommendation ("R&R," Doc. 15), recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be granted, the Motion to Stay be denied as moot, and Plaintiff's Second Motion for Default Judgement be denied.
Plaintiff filed an Objection to Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) nearly three weeks after the deadline per Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). As such, the Court is under no obligation to consider Plaintiff's objections. However, even if the Court were to consider Plaintiff's objections, they do not address the substantive analysis in the R&R.
The Court agrees with the analysis set forth in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 11) is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
3. Defendant's Motion to Stay Timelines and Discovery (Doc. 12) is DENIED as moot.
4. Plaintiff's Second Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 13) is DENIED.
5. The Clerk is directed to close this case.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
