KARLA R. SPAULDING, Magistrate Judge.
This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein:
Plaintiff, Robert Woodrow Carnes, seeks an award of attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. An order reversing the decision below was entered on July 26, 2018, and final judgment issued on July 27, 2018. Doc. Nos. 20, 21. Counsel for Plaintiff represents that the Commissioner does not object to the relief requested. Doc. No. 22, at 2. The motion was referred to me for issuance for a Report and Recommendation, and it is now ripe for consideration.
Plaintiff through Shea A. Fugate, Esq., his counsel of record, seeks an award of $6,138.60 in EAJA fees. Doc. No. 22, at 1. The fee request covers 26.5 hours of work performed by Attorney Fugate in 2017 and 4.7 hours of work performed by her in 2018. Doc. No. 22-2, at 3-4.
The EAJA sets a ceiling of $125.00
Based on the cost-of-living adjustment, the rate requested by Attorney Fugate does not exceed the EAJA cap of $125.00 per hour adjusted for inflation. Therefore, I recommend that the Court approve the requested hourly rate in the absence of objection. I also recommend that the Court find the total number of hours worked by Attorney Fugate to be reasonable in the absence of objection.
Finally, I note that Plaintiff signed a document in which he assigned any fees awarded under the EAJA to his counsel. Doc. No. 22-3. Plaintiff represents that the Commissioner will accept Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and pay fees directly to Plaintiff's counsel, assuming that the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt. Doc. No. 22, at 2. Because the Commissioner has taken inconsistent positions regarding whether she will honor such an assignment, I recommend that the Court not require that the EAJA fees be paid directly to Plaintiff's counsel but permit the Commissioner to do so in her discretion.
Accordingly, I
A party has fourteen days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. A party's failure to file written objections waives that party's right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1.