Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Rocher, 2:17-cr-107-FtM-38MRM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20181024k28 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF FORFEITURE SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . The defendant pleaded guilty to Counts One, Two, and Four of the Indictment each of which charge him drug distribution offenses, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C), and the United States has established that the defendant obtained $4,002.00 in proceeds as a result of the offenses. The United States moves under 21 U.S.C. 853 and Rule 32.2(b)(2), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to forfeit the $4,002.00
More

ORDER OF FORFEITURE

The defendant pleaded guilty to Counts One, Two, and Four of the Indictment each of which charge him drug distribution offenses, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C), and the United States has established that the defendant obtained $4,002.00 in proceeds as a result of the offenses.

The United States moves under 21 U.S.C. § 853 and Rule 32.2(b)(2), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to forfeit the $4,002.00 in proceeds. The motion is GRANTED. The United States is entitled to forfeit the $4,002.00 in proceeds which the defendant obtained as a result of the drug distribution offenses.

Because the $4,002.00 in proceeds was dissipated by the defendant, the United States may seek, as a substitute asset, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), forfeiture of any of the defendant's property up to the value of $4,002.00. Jurisdiction is retained to enter any order necessary for the forfeiture and disposition of any substitute asset and to address any third-party claim.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer