Filed: Oct. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on review of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Doc. 50) filed on October 23, 2018. Subject-matter jurisdiction is premised on the presence of diversity of citizenship between the parties. This requires complete diversity of citizenship, and that the matter in controversy exceed the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. 28 U.S.C. 1332(a); Morrison v. Allstate Indem. Co., 228 F.3d 1255
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on review of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Doc. 50) filed on October 23, 2018. Subject-matter jurisdiction is premised on the presence of diversity of citizenship between the parties. This requires complete diversity of citizenship, and that the matter in controversy exceed the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. 28 U.S.C. 1332(a); Morrison v. Allstate Indem. Co., 228 F.3d 1255 ..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on review of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Doc. 50) filed on October 23, 2018. Subject-matter jurisdiction is premised on the presence of diversity of citizenship between the parties. This requires complete diversity of citizenship, and that the matter in controversy exceed the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); Morrison v. Allstate Indem. Co., 228 F.3d 1255, 1261 (11th Cir. 2000). If the Court determines "at any time" that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the Court must dismiss the case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).
Plaintiffs state that they are "individuals residing in Lee County, Florida." (Doc. 50, ¶ 4). Plaintiffs also allege "upon information and belief" that Defendant Louis Fisi is a "resident of Ohio." (Id., ¶ 5). An individual is a citizen where he is domiciled, not necessarily where he is a resident. See McCormick v. Aderholt, 293 F.3d 1254, 1257 (11th Cir. 2002) ("Citizenship is equivalent to `domicile' for purposes of diversity jurisdiction."). Domicile is the place of an individual's true, fixed, and permanent home and to which he intends to return whenever he is absent therefrom. See Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30, 48 (1989) (citations omitted). A domicile is not synonymous with a residence, and it is possible for someone to reside in one place but be domiciled in another. See id.
Plaintiffs have failed to properly allege the citizenship of the parties; therefore, the Court cannot determine that diversity of citizenship is present. Plaintiffs will be provided an opportunity to state the presence of federal jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1653.2
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Doc. 50) is dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction without prejudice to filing a Second Amended Complaint on or before October 31, 2018. Failure to file a Second Amended Complaint by this date will result in this matter being closed without further notice.
DONE and ORDERED.
