Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Warden, 6:18-cr-191-Orl-37GJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20181128c02 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROY B. DALTON, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court are Defendants' motions for release from custody pre-sentencing following the entry and acceptance of Defendants' guilty pleas to a qualifying offense under 18 U.S.C. 3143. (Doc. 67 (" Nicholson Motion "); Doc. 69 (" Warden Motion ").) On referral, and after holding a hearing, U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly recommends denying both motions. (Docs. 73, 76 (" R&Rs. ").) For the Nicholson Motion, Magistrate Judge Kelly reco
More

ORDER

Before the Court are Defendants' motions for release from custody pre-sentencing following the entry and acceptance of Defendants' guilty pleas to a qualifying offense under 18 U.S.C. § 3143. (Doc. 67 ("Nicholson Motion"); Doc. 69 ("Warden Motion").) On referral, and after holding a hearing, U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly recommends denying both motions. (Docs. 73, 76 ("R&Rs.").) For the Nicholson Motion, Magistrate Judge Kelly recommends denial because the medical procedure is both unnecessary and not an "exceptional" reason justifying release from detention. (Doc. 73, pp. 2-3.) And he recommends denying Warden's Motion because his desire to seek out-patient drug treatment and support his family are similarly unavailing and unexceptional. (Doc. 76, p. 2.) Defendants did not object to the R&Rs, and the time for doing so has now passed. Absent objections, the Court has examined the R&Rs only for clear error. See Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-557-T-27EAJ, 2016 WL 355490, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 28, 2016); see also Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App'x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the Court concludes that the R&Rs are due to be adopted in their entirety.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly's Report and Recommendations (Docs. 73 and 76) are ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order. 2. Defendant Gerald Nicholson's Motion for Release from Custody for Medical Purposes (Doc. 67) is DENIED. 3. Defendant Roderick Warden's Motion for Release (Doc. 69) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer