Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pruco Life Insurance Company v. Federici, 2:18-CV-00546-SPC-MRM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20181129b62 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff Pruco Life Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Deposit Interpleader Funds. (Doc. 35). All interested parties agree to have the funds deposited into the registry of this Court. (Doc. 35-1 at 4). Two of the Defendants, Shane Federici and Ian Hathaway, suggest that the funds be deposited into the Trust Account of one of Defendants' Counsel. (Doc. 35-1 at 5). Plaintiff does not oppose this reques
More

ORDER1

Before the Court is Plaintiff Pruco Life Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Deposit Interpleader Funds. (Doc. 35). All interested parties agree to have the funds deposited into the registry of this Court. (Doc. 35-1 at ¶ 4). Two of the Defendants, Shane Federici and Ian Hathaway, suggest that the funds be deposited into the Trust Account of one of Defendants' Counsel. (Doc. 35-1 at ¶ 5). Plaintiff does not oppose this request. Having carefully considered Plaintiff's unopposed motion, the Court finds good cause to grant the relief requested. But because not all defendants stipulate to the money being deposited into a Trust Account, the funds will be deposited into the Court registry.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

Plaintiff Pruco Life Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Deposit Interpleader Funds (Doc. 35) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall DEPOSIT the funds into the Registry of the Court within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of this Order.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer