Scarpiello v. Medical Support Los Angeles, 8:18-cv-1860-MSS-AEP. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20181210b84
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER ANTHONY E. PORCELLI , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motions to Compel Discovery Responses (Docs. 42 & 49) and Defendant's Response in Opposition (Doc. 52). A telephonic hearing was held on December 6, 2018. Accordingly, after due consideration and for the reasons stated at the hearing, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Defendant, Medical Support Los Angeles, a Medical Corporation ("MSLA"), has until 5:00 PM on December 7, 2018 to file a motion requesti
Summary: ORDER ANTHONY E. PORCELLI , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motions to Compel Discovery Responses (Docs. 42 & 49) and Defendant's Response in Opposition (Doc. 52). A telephonic hearing was held on December 6, 2018. Accordingly, after due consideration and for the reasons stated at the hearing, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Defendant, Medical Support Los Angeles, a Medical Corporation ("MSLA"), has until 5:00 PM on December 7, 2018 to file a motion requestin..
More
ORDER
ANTHONY E. PORCELLI, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motions to Compel Discovery Responses (Docs. 42 & 49) and Defendant's Response in Opposition (Doc. 52). A telephonic hearing was held on December 6, 2018. Accordingly, after due consideration and for the reasons stated at the hearing, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1. Defendant, Medical Support Los Angeles, a Medical Corporation ("MSLA"), has until 5:00 PM on December 7, 2018 to file a motion requesting a confidentiality order. If such a motion is filed, the Court will issue a notice scheduling a hearing on the matter for December 13, 2018 at 10:30 AM.
2. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 42) is GRANTED as to interrogatory requests No. 2-5 and No. 8, insofar as the Defendant's responses must be amended without the objections.
3. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 49) is GRANTED as to Interrogatory No. 9, and a response must be produced upon the Court's entry of a confidentiality order.
4. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 49) is GRANTED as to requests for production No. 1-4 and No. 6, and production of the requested discovery shall occur upon the Court's entry of a confidentiality order.
5. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 42) is DENIED without prejudice as to requests for production No. 5 and No. 11.
6. The Court will issue a notice scheduling a status conference hearing for January 3, 2019 at 10:00 AM to address any discovery matters.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle