Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KMM Construction of Florida, LLC v. Great American Insurance Company, 2:18-cv-662-FtM-38MRM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20190103790 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Consolidate for All Purposes (Doc. 32) filed on December 28, 2018. The parties request this Court consolidate this action with a case currently pending before the undersigned for the sake of convenience and judicial economy — Continental 332 Fund, LLC et al v. Albertelli et al., Case No. 2:17-cv-41-38MRM. Since this Motion is unopposed and the cases share a common nucleus
More

ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Consolidate for All Purposes (Doc. 32) filed on December 28, 2018. The parties request this Court consolidate this action with a case currently pending before the undersigned for the sake of convenience and judicial economy — Continental 332 Fund, LLC et al v. Albertelli et al., Case No. 2:17-cv-41-38MRM. Since this Motion is unopposed and the cases share a common nucleus of facts, the Court finds good cause to consolidate the two actions. See Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 776 F.2d 1492, 1495 (11th Cir. 1985) (noting district courts enjoy broad discretion in whether to consolidate actions).

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) Joint Motion to Consolidate for All Purposes (Doc. 32) is GRANTED. (2) The Clerk of Court is directed to CONSOLIDATE this case with the undersigned's case styled Continental 332 Fund, LLC et al v. Albertelli et al., Case No. 2:17-cv-41-38MRM for all future proceedings, which will serve as the lead case.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer