Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mahoney v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 8:19-cv-118-T-02SPF. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20190214c54 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM F. JUNG , District Judge . Upon careful consideration of Defendant's Motion to Refer Matter to Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (Dkt. 5) and Plaintiff's Response (Dkt. 9), the Court concludes the motion should be denied. The arbitration agreement binds Wells Fargo and Hunters Transporting and Towing, LLC (HTT). Dkts. 5-3, 5-4 at 8. Laura Vincent signed the application to open a business account for HTT. Eric Mahoney did not. She is listed in the public records as a manager o
More

ORDER

Upon careful consideration of Defendant's Motion to Refer Matter to Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (Dkt. 5) and Plaintiff's Response (Dkt. 9), the Court concludes the motion should be denied.

The arbitration agreement binds Wells Fargo and Hunters Transporting and Towing, LLC (HTT). Dkts. 5-3, 5-4 at 8. Laura Vincent signed the application to open a business account for HTT. Eric Mahoney did not. She is listed in the public records as a manager of HTT (Dkt. 5-2), but was also named, allegedly incorrectly, as the sole owner on the application. Dkts. 5-2, 5-3.

The gravamen of this removed action is that Defendant negligently permitted Vincent to open a business account for HTT. Dkt. 1-9. The actions or omissions of Defendant allegedly led to Mahoney, as the sole owner of HTT, suffering financial damages from the theft of HTT"s money by Vincent. Id.

State law governs whether non-signatories can be compelled to arbitrate. See Am. Personality Photos, LLC v. Mason, 589 F.Supp.2d 1325, 1330 (S.D. Fla. 2008). Defendant does not suggest what applicable state law applies, but contends that the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq. (FAA) generally governs the validity of an arbitration agreement. See Dimattina Holdings, LLC v. Steri-Clean, Inc., 195 F.Supp.3d 1285, 1288-89 (S.D. Fla. 2016) (noting that whether parties are bound by a given arbitration clause should be decided by a judge). Defendant has failed to show that Mahoney as a non-signatory can be compelled to arbitrate.

ACCORDINGLY, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to Refer Matter to Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (Dkt. 5) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer