Collier v. Combe Incorporated, 6:19-cv-82-Orl-28TBS. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20190222a39
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Defendants Combe Incorporated, Combe Products, Inc., Combe Laboratories LLC and Combe International LLC's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Doc. 19) is DENIED. First, the Court does not know when or if these Defendants have been served. Second, these Defendants have not shown good cause why any extension, let alone a 60 day extension is warranted. Third, the motion does not comply with Local Rules 3.01(a) or (g). DONE and ORD
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Defendants Combe Incorporated, Combe Products, Inc., Combe Laboratories LLC and Combe International LLC's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Doc. 19) is DENIED. First, the Court does not know when or if these Defendants have been served. Second, these Defendants have not shown good cause why any extension, let alone a 60 day extension is warranted. Third, the motion does not comply with Local Rules 3.01(a) or (g). DONE and ORDE..
More
ORDER
THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Defendants Combe Incorporated, Combe Products, Inc., Combe Laboratories LLC and Combe International LLC's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Doc. 19) is DENIED. First, the Court does not know when or if these Defendants have been served. Second, these Defendants have not shown good cause why any extension, let alone a 60 day extension is warranted. Third, the motion does not comply with Local Rules 3.01(a) or (g).
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
