Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Vazzo v. City of Tampa, 8:17-cv-2896-T-02AAS. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20190306d36 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM F. JUNG , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Dkt. 148) of Magistrate Judge Sansone on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkts. 84, 92) the First Amended Verified Complaint (Dkt. 78). The Court has considered Defendant's objections to the R&R (Dkt. 155), and the Plaintiffs' Response (Dkt. 160). The parties appeared at oral argument set on the motion (Dkts. 150, 157) on March 5, 2019. The Court hereby adopts and affirms the R&R at docket 14
More

ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Dkt. 148) of Magistrate Judge Sansone on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkts. 84, 92) the First Amended Verified Complaint (Dkt. 78). The Court has considered Defendant's objections to the R&R (Dkt. 155), and the Plaintiffs' Response (Dkt. 160). The parties appeared at oral argument set on the motion (Dkts. 150, 157) on March 5, 2019.

The Court hereby adopts and affirms the R&R at docket 148. The motion to dismiss is granted in part as stated at docket 148. In the interest of judicial economy, the Plaintiffs need not refile a second amended complaint. The first amended complaint shall stand as delimited and truncated by the R&R (Dkt. 148 at 38-39). Defendant shall file an answer and defenses to same within fourteen (14) days.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer