Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Garcia, 2:18-cr-68-FtM-38MRM. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20190508c32 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 06, 2019
Latest Update: May 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on sua sponte review of the file. On February 7, 2019, Defendant Juan Carlos Alfaro Garcia moved the Court to decide his competency to proceed. (Doc. 63). At the Government's request, the Court sent Garcia to a special federal facility to be evaluated. (Doc. 69). The Warden later asked the Court to extend the evaluation period to April 10, 2019. (Doc. 77). The Court granted the extension and directed th
More

ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on sua sponte review of the file. On February 7, 2019, Defendant Juan Carlos Alfaro Garcia moved the Court to decide his competency to proceed. (Doc. 63). At the Government's request, the Court sent Garcia to a special federal facility to be evaluated. (Doc. 69). The Warden later asked the Court to extend the evaluation period to April 10, 2019. (Doc. 77). The Court granted the extension and directed the psychiatric or psychological report be filed under seal by April 24, 2019. (Doc. 78). That deadline has come and gone with no report being filed. Because the Government sought the evaluation, the Court directs it to provide a status update on the competency evaluation and report.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Government is DIRECTED to file under seal a notice updating the Court on the status of Garcia's competency evaluation and report on or before May 9, 2019.

DONE AND ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer