Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dempsey v. Jayadi, LLC, 2:18-cv-666-FtM-38MRM. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20190529c99 Visitors: 16
Filed: May 28, 2019
Latest Update: May 28, 2019
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER 1 SHERI POLYSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is the parties' joint Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice (Doc. 34). Plaintiff sued Defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") for unpaid wages. (Doc. 1). The parties now inform the Court that Plaintiff's claims have been resolved in full without compromise and with attorney's fees negotiated separately. (Doc. 34). Therefore, there is no need for the Court to review and approve the settlement f
More

OPINION AND ORDER1

Before the Court is the parties' joint Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice (Doc. 34). Plaintiff sued Defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") for unpaid wages. (Doc. 1). The parties now inform the Court that Plaintiff's claims have been resolved in full without compromise and with attorney's fees negotiated separately. (Doc. 34). Therefore, there is no need for the Court to review and approve the settlement for fairness. See Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Mackenzie v. Kindred Hosps. East, L.L.C., 276 F.Supp.2d 1211, 1217 (M.D. Fla. 2003). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action voluntarily by filing a stipulation signed by all parties who have appeared, as the parties have done here.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer