DANIEL C. IRICK, Magistrate Judge.
This cause comes before the Court for consideration without oral argument on the following motion:
Plaintiff's counsel moves for an award of attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). Doc. 31 (the Motion). Plaintiff's counsel states that following the Court's reversal of the Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits and remand of the case for further administrative proceedings, Plaintiff was awarded past-due benefits. Id. The Motion provides that 25% of the total amount of benefits awarded in this matter equates to $15,435.50. Id., citing 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) (recovery of such fees under this section may not exceed 25% of the total past-due benefits). Plaintiff's counsel states that upon award of this amount counsel will refund $5,172.39 (the previously awarded EAJA fee) directly to Plaintiff.
The undersigned notes that Plaintiff's counsel does not specifically provide the Court with the amount of the retroactive benefits, but instead concludes that $15,435.50 is 25% of that figure. Even so, the Notice of Award attached as an exhibit provides that the Social Security Administration (SSA) withheld $15,435.50 from the "past due benefits in case [SSA] need[s] to pay [Plaintiff's] representative." Doc. 31-3. Given the supporting documentation for the amount and the fact that the Commissioner does not oppose the Motion, the undersigned finds that counsel's request for the attorneys fees does not run afoul of the limit imposed by § 406(b) and is reasonable under the circumstances of this case.
Accordingly, it is respectfully
A party has fourteen days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. A party's failure to file written objections waives that party's right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1.
Recommended in Orlando.