Carl v. Commissioner of Social Security, 6:19-cv-1027-Orl-37TBS. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20190620a10
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2019
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THOMAS B. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Valerie Ann Carl is contesting Defendant the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for Social Security disability benefits (Doc. 1). Plaintiff has filed an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2). The Application includes Plaintiff's Affidavit of Indigency in which she states that she has $19,000 in cash or in a checking or savings account (Doc. 2-1, IV
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THOMAS B. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Valerie Ann Carl is contesting Defendant the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for Social Security disability benefits (Doc. 1). Plaintiff has filed an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2). The Application includes Plaintiff's Affidavit of Indigency in which she states that she has $19,000 in cash or in a checking or savings account (Doc. 2-1, IV,..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Valerie Ann Carl is contesting Defendant the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for Social Security disability benefits (Doc. 1). Plaintiff has filed an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2). The Application includes Plaintiff's Affidavit of Indigency in which she states that she has $19,000 in cash or in a checking or savings account (Doc. 2-1, § IV, ¶ 2(b)). She also has an RV of unknown value upon which she, or someone on her behalf, makes payments of $1,300 per month (Id., ¶ 6). Because Plaintiff has these assets, I find that she is able to pay the costs of this action. Therefore, I respectfully recommend that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED.
Notice to Parties
A party has fourteen days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. A party's failure to file written objections waives that party's right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1.
RESPECTFULLY RECOMMENDED.
Source: Leagle
