Filed: Jun. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER PAUL G. BYRON , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff Maz Partners LP's Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Approval of Selection of Counsel (Doc. 29) filed on May 28, 2019. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the fin
Summary: ORDER PAUL G. BYRON , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff Maz Partners LP's Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Approval of Selection of Counsel (Doc. 29) filed on May 28, 2019. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the find..
More
ORDER
PAUL G. BYRON, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff Maz Partners LP's Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Approval of Selection of Counsel (Doc. 29) filed on May 28, 2019. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part.
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation.
Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation filed June 12, 2019 (Doc. 34), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. MAZ Partners LP's Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Approval of Selection of Counsel (Doc. 29) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
3. Plaintiff MAZ Partners LP is APPOINTED as lead plaintiff in this case pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(i).
4. The law firm of Wolf Popper, LP is APPOINTED as lead counsel representing the purported class pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v).
5. Plaintiff's request to appoint the law firm of Rice Pugatch Robinson Storfer & Cohen PLLC as "liaison counsel" in this case is DENIED.
6. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.
