Mobley v. Commissioner of Social Security, 6:18-cv-896-Orl-41LRH. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20190703c21
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1). Plaintiff seeks review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for Social Security Disability benefits. United States Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17), recommending that the final decision be affirmed in part and reversed in part, and that the case be remanded for further proceedings. After
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1). Plaintiff seeks review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for Social Security Disability benefits. United States Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17), recommending that the final decision be affirmed in part and reversed in part, and that the case be remanded for further proceedings. After a..
More
ORDER
CARLOS E. MENDOZA, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1). Plaintiff seeks review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for Social Security Disability benefits. United States Magistrate Judge Leslie R. Hoffman submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17), recommending that the final decision be affirmed in part and reversed in part, and that the case be remanded for further proceedings.
After a de novo review of the record, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees with the analysis set forth in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. The final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner to reconsider the decision that Plaintiff was not disabled prior to March 31, 2017. As to the remaining issues raised, the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.
3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff. Thereafter, the Clerk shall close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
