Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Siebert v. Novak Environmental Services, LLC, 2:18-cv-796-FtM-38MRM. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20190709883 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2019
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) filed on July 7, 2019. Judge McCoy recommends granting the parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismiss With Prejudice (Doc. 22) as a "fair and reasonable solution of a bona fide dispute" of the FLSA issues, and denying the parties' request to reserve jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement
More

OPINION AND ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) filed on July 7, 2019. Judge McCoy recommends granting the parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismiss With Prejudice (Doc. 22) as a "fair and reasonable solution of a bona fide dispute" of the FLSA issues, and denying the parties' request to reserve jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. The parties filed a Joint Notice of Non-Objection, waiving their right to file written objections (Doc. 25) on July 8, 2019. Thus, the Report and Recommendation is ripe for review.

A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." Id. And "[t]he judge may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." Id.

After examining the file independently, and upon considering Judge McCoy's findings and recommendations, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein.

(2) The Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismiss With Prejudice (Doc. 22) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

a. The Joint Motion is granted to the extent that the Settlement Agreement (Doc. 22-1) is APPROVED as a "fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute" of the parties' FLSA issues. b. The Joint Motion is DENIED to the extent it requests the Court retain jurisdiction.

(3) The above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

(4) The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer