Jurec v. Rawl, 3:18-cv-591-J-32JRK. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20190712a88
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN , District Judge . This case is before the Court on the Defendant Walter P. Rawl & Sons, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 48). On June 17, 2019, the assigned United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 56) recommending that the motion be denied. No party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time in which to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. C
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN , District Judge . This case is before the Court on the Defendant Walter P. Rawl & Sons, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 48). On June 17, 2019, the assigned United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 56) recommending that the motion be denied. No party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time in which to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Ci..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the Defendant Walter P. Rawl & Sons, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 48). On June 17, 2019, the assigned United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 56) recommending that the motion be denied. No party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time in which to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); M.D. Fla. R. 6.02(a).
Upon de novo review and for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 56), it is hereby
ORDERED:
1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 56) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
2. Defendant Walter P. Rawl & Sons, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 48) is DENIED. No later than August 2, 2019, Defendant will answer Count II of the SAC.1
3. The parties remain governed by the Second Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. 46), as amended (Doc. 54).
DONE AND ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Defendant has already answered Count I of the SAC. (Doc. 47).
Source: Leagle
