Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Sinibaldi, 8:02-cr-111-T-17MAP. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20190801642 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2019
Summary: PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE FOR SUBSTITUTE ASSETS ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH , District Judge . THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the United States of America's Motion for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture for any and all accounts held at Ameriprise Financial, Inc., in the name of Dean Sinibaldi, client number 22309603-001, as substitute assets in partial satisfaction of the defendant's $200,000,000.00 Forfeiture Money Judgment. Being fully advised of the relevant facts, the Court
More

PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE FOR SUBSTITUTE ASSETS

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the United States of America's Motion for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture for any and all accounts held at Ameriprise Financial, Inc., in the name of Dean Sinibaldi, client number 22309603-001, as substitute assets in partial satisfaction of the defendant's $200,000,000.00 Forfeiture Money Judgment.

Being fully advised of the relevant facts, the Court hereby finds that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1) and Rule 32.2(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a Forfeiture Money Judgment was entered against the defendant in the amount of $2,000,000.00.

The Court further finds that, the United States may seek, as a substitute asset, forfeiture of any of the defendant's property up to the value of the Forfeiture Money Judgment's remaining balance of $1,629,113.38. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that for good cause shown, the United States' motion is GRANTED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as incorporated by 18 U.S.C. § 982(b)(1), and Rule 32.2(e)(1)(B), the accounts identified above are hereby forfeited to the United States for disposition according to law, in partial satisfaction of the defendant's $2,000,000.00 Forfeiture Money Judgment, subject to the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 853(n).

The net proceeds from the accounts shall be credited towards satisfaction of the defendant's Forfeiture Money Judgment.

The Court retains jurisdiction to address any third party claim that may be asserted in these proceedings, and to enter any further order necessary for the forfeiture and disposition of such property.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer