Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lincoln Square Capital Management, LLC v. Rizzo, 2:18-cv-686-FtM-38NPM. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20190830a06 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Status Report of Bankruptcy Case (Doc. 39), informing the Court that the bankruptcy stay of this case is due to be lifted because the Bankruptcy Court determined that the debt Defendant owes to Plaintiff is exempted from discharge pursuant to a Final Default Judgment. (Doc. 39-1). Therefore, the Court finds that the stay is due to be lifted and this case is reinstated to active status. Beca
More

ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Status Report of Bankruptcy Case (Doc. 39), informing the Court that the bankruptcy stay of this case is due to be lifted because the Bankruptcy Court determined that the debt Defendant owes to Plaintiff is exempted from discharge pursuant to a Final Default Judgment. (Doc. 39-1). Therefore, the Court finds that the stay is due to be lifted and this case is reinstated to active status. Because this case was commenced as a registration of a foreign judgment, there are no deadlines that presently affect the case. If there are any pre-stay motions that the Court needs to consider they will need to be re-filed.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The stay is hereby LIFTED. The Clerk shall reopen the case and correct the case flags.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer