Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Clerk of the Circuit Court v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2:19-cv-515-FtM-38MRM. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20191029j95 Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is the parties' Joint Notice of Disbursement (Doc. 32). This is an interpleader action. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller for Collier County, Florida disbursed the funds at issue to the remaining Defendant United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (Doc. 32 at 1). Because the parties resolved all outstanding issues, the case is dismissed in accordance with the Court's last Order (Doc. 30
More

ORDER1

Before the Court is the parties' Joint Notice of Disbursement (Doc. 32). This is an interpleader action. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller for Collier County, Florida disbursed the funds at issue to the remaining Defendant United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (Doc. 32 at 1). Because the parties resolved all outstanding issues, the case is dismissed in accordance with the Court's last Order (Doc. 30) and the parties' Stipulation and Order for Entry of Judgment in Interpleader and Dismissal (Doc. 25).

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Complaint (Doc. 4) is DISMISSED. 2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate all pending deadlines and motions and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer