Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Fragozo, 8:12-CR-261-T-17TGW. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20191112717 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH , Senior District Judge . This cause is before the Court on: Dkt. 128 Motion for Retroactive Application of Sentencing Guidelines Pursuant to Amendment 782 Dkt. 134 Amendment 782 Memorandum Dkt. 141 Notice of Federal Defender's Office Dkt. 145 Order Denying Motion Dkt. 149 Motion for Retroactive Application of Sentencing Guidelines Pursuant to Amendment 782 Dkt. 151 Amendment 782 Memorandum Dkt. 155 Defendant's Memorandum Defendant
More

ORDER

This cause is before the Court on:

Dkt. 128 Motion for Retroactive Application of Sentencing Guidelines Pursuant to Amendment 782 Dkt. 134 Amendment 782 Memorandum Dkt. 141 Notice of Federal Defender's Office Dkt. 145 Order Denying Motion Dkt. 149 Motion for Retroactive Application of Sentencing Guidelines Pursuant to Amendment 782 Dkt. 151 Amendment 782 Memorandum Dkt. 155 Defendant's Memorandum

Defendant Leonel Fragozo, pro se, moves for a 2-level reduction of sentence pursuant to Amendment 782.

Defendant Fragozo entered into a Plea Agreement (Dkt. 71), pleading guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment. Defendant Fragozo was sentenced on Count 1 on June 27, 2013 to a term of imprisonment of 262 months, a 60-month term of supervised release; fine waived, and a special assessment fee of $100.00. At sentencing, Defendant Fragozo was accountable for 910 kilograms of cocaine. Count 2 was dismissed on the Government's Motion.

The Court denied Defendant's previous Motion seeking a sentence reduction because Defendant's base offense level remained at level 38 due to the quantity of drugs; the amended guideline did not have the effect of lowering Defendant's offense level.

The Court adopts and incorporates the prior Order denying Defendant Fragozo's Amendment 782 Motion (Dkt. 145). After consideration, the Court Denies Defendant Fragozo's Motion for Retroactive Application of Sentencing Guidelines Pursuant to Amendment 782. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that pro se Defendant Leonel Fragozo's Motion for Retroactive Application of Sentencing Guidelines Pursuant to Amendment 782 (Dkt. 149) is denied.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer