Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Carroll, 8:99-CR-56-T-17. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20191211715 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH , Senior District Judge . This cause is before the Court on: Dkt. 100 Motion for Early Termination of Supervision Dkt. 102 Response Defendant Anthony Leon Carroll, pro se, moves for early termination of supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(e). The Government has filed a response which indicates that the supervising officer does not object to early termination, in light of the fact that Defendant Carroll has not tested positive for ill
More

ORDER

This cause is before the Court on:

Dkt. 100 Motion for Early Termination of Supervision Dkt. 102 Response

Defendant Anthony Leon Carroll, pro se, moves for early termination of supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(e).

The Government has filed a response which indicates that the supervising officer does not object to early termination, in light of the fact that Defendant Carroll has not tested positive for illicit substances since later 2018, and Defendant Carroll has received all the services and support that the U.S. Probation Office can provide. However, based on Defendant Carroll's count of conviction, 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841(b)(1)(A), which imposes a mandatory 5-year term of supervised release, the Government must oppose Defendant Carroll's request for early termination of supervision.

The Court has reviewed the record, noting Defendant Carroll's criminal history, and that Defendant Carroll was sentenced as a career offender.

The Court notes that Defendant Carroll has completed more than one year of supervised release. Defendant Carroll's supervision is scheduled to terminate on November 9, 2020.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(e)(1), I have considered the factors set forth on 18 U.S.C. Secs. 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B), (a)(2)(C), (a)(2)(D), (a)(4), (a)(5), and (a)(6), and determine that early termination of the 60-month term of supervised release is not warranted, and is not in the interest of justice.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that pro se Defendant Anthony Leon Carroll's Motion for Early Termination of Supervision (Dkt. 100) is denied.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer