McCoy v. Commissioner of Social Security, 5:19-cv-324-Oc-18PRL. (2020)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20200107750
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 02, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2020
Summary: ORDER G. KENDALL SHARP , Senior District Judge . This case was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation on Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand, filed on November 21, 2019 (Doc. 15). After review of the Report and Recommendation entered on November 26, 2019 (Doc. 16), and noting no timely objections have been filed, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. United States Magistrate J
Summary: ORDER G. KENDALL SHARP , Senior District Judge . This case was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation on Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand, filed on November 21, 2019 (Doc. 15). After review of the Report and Recommendation entered on November 26, 2019 (Doc. 16), and noting no timely objections have been filed, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. United States Magistrate Ju..
More
ORDER
G. KENDALL SHARP, Senior District Judge.
This case was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation on Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand, filed on November 21, 2019 (Doc. 15). After review of the Report and Recommendation entered on November 26, 2019 (Doc. 16), and noting no timely objections have been filed, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. United States Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) is APPROVED and ADOPTED and made part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review.
2. The Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 15) is GRANTED. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for the following reasons:
So that the ALJ may further evaluate Dr. Daniel Henderson's opinion, reconsider Plaintiff's mental impairments, re-assess the RFC, if necessary, with psychological or psychiatric expert evidence; as warranted, obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert to clarify the effect of the assessed limitations on Plaintiff's ability to perform other work in the national economy; take any further action to complete the administrative record; offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing; and issue a new decision, and many other proceedings the Commissioner deems appropriate.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE the case.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
