Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mangel v. Daza, 2:19-cv-525-FtM-38MRM. (2020)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20200117d93 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2020
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is a sua sponte review of the file. On December 9, 2019, the Court dismissed one of Plaintiff Ryan Sean Mangel's claims—but Mangel's other claim survived. (Doc. 37 at 8). So now Mangel has one claim for defamation pending against Defendant Ani Katiuska Daza. (Doc. 37 at 5-8). That is Count II in the Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 17 at 12-15). The Court ordered Daza to file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint by Dec
More

ORDER1

Before the Court is a sua sponte review of the file. On December 9, 2019, the Court dismissed one of Plaintiff Ryan Sean Mangel's claims—but Mangel's other claim survived. (Doc. 37 at 8). So now Mangel has one claim for defamation pending against Defendant Ani Katiuska Daza. (Doc. 37 at 5-8). That is Count II in the Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 17 at 12-15). The Court ordered Daza to file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint by December 24, 2019. (Doc. 37 at 8). But Daza never filed anything. So on January 3, 2020, the Court explained this situation and again ordered Daza to answer or show cause why a default should not be entered against her by January 10, 2020. (Doc. 38). The Court warned Daza that failing to comply "may result in the entry of a default against" her. Still, Daza never responded or filed anything.

This is Daza's final warning. If Daza does not file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 17), on or before January 23, 2020, the Court will enter a default against Daza for failing to plead or otherwise defend this case. At that point, Mangel will then be able to move for a default judgment against Daza.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

Defendant Ani Katiuska Daza must FILE an answer to the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 17), on or before January 23, 2020. The failure to comply with this Order (by not filing an answer or otherwise defending this case) will result in the entry of a default against Daza without further notice.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink's availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer