Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In Re Harris, 19-40046 (2011)

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida Number: 19-40046 Visitors: 12
Judges: Lewis M. Killian, Jr.
Filed: Oct. 03, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: 456 B.R. 89 (2011) In re Susan Marie HARRIS, Debtor. Susan Marie Harris, Plaintiff, v. Ben-Ezra & Katz, P.A., LPS Default Solutions, Inc. & Lender Processing Services, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-30376-LMK. Adversary No. 11-03021-LMK. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division. October 3, 2011. Sharon T. Sperling, Esq., Gainesville, FL, for Debtor. Tripp Scott, PA, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for VT Inc. Leigh D. Hart, Esq., Tallahassee, FL, for Trustee. ORDER GRANTING DEFE
More
456 B.R. 89 (2011)

In re Susan Marie HARRIS, Debtor.
Susan Marie Harris, Plaintiff,
v.
Ben-Ezra & Katz, P.A., LPS Default Solutions, Inc. & Lender Processing Services, Inc., Defendants.

Bankruptcy No. 08-30376-LMK. Adversary No. 11-03021-LMK.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division.

October 3, 2011.

Sharon T. Sperling, Esq., Gainesville, FL, for Debtor.

Tripp Scott, PA, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for VT Inc.

Leigh D. Hart, Esq., Tallahassee, FL, for Trustee.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO DISMISS

LEWIS M. KILLIAN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the Court on the LPS Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiffs notice of voluntary dismissal and alternative motion for leave to dismiss voluntarily pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). After due consideration of the record and pleadings, the Court finds that the Defendants' motion to strike is due to be granted, the Plaintiffs notice of dismissal stricken, and the Plaintiffs alternative motion for leave to dismiss denied. It is hereby

ORDERED that the LPS Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiffs notice of voluntary dismissal is GRANTED, and the Plaintiffs notice of voluntary dismissal is STRICKEN; and it is further

ORDERED that the Plaintiffs alternative motion for leave to dismiss voluntarily pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(2) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer