WRIGHT v. YOUNG, 4:10-cv-474-SPM-GRJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120110665
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER GARY R. JONES, Magistrate Judge. On December 6, 2011, Defendants Keyshonda Thompson and Lamonte Peterson filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 22.) N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(C)(1) provides "Each party opposing a motion shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of the motion in which to file and serve a responsive memorandum with citation of authorities in opposition to the motion." As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has neither
Summary: ORDER GARY R. JONES, Magistrate Judge. On December 6, 2011, Defendants Keyshonda Thompson and Lamonte Peterson filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 22.) N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(C)(1) provides "Each party opposing a motion shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of the motion in which to file and serve a responsive memorandum with citation of authorities in opposition to the motion." As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has neither ..
More
ORDER
GARY R. JONES, Magistrate Judge.
On December 6, 2011, Defendants Keyshonda Thompson and Lamonte Peterson filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 22.) N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(C)(1) provides "Each party opposing a motion shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of the motion in which to file and serve a responsive memorandum with citation of authorities in opposition to the motion." As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has neither filed a response nor filed a motion for an extension of time to respond to the motion to dismiss.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff shall respond to the Motion To Dismiss filed by Defendants Keyshonda Thompson and Lamonte Peterson (Doc. 22) on or before January 30, 2012.
2. Failure to comply with this Order in the allotted time will result in a recommendation to the district judge that the motion to dismiss be granted pursuant to N.D.Fla.Loc. Rule 7.1(C) for failure to file a responsive memorandum.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
