Filed: Mar. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOHN J. O'SULLIVAN, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion to Compel Response to Plaintiff's First Request for Production in Aid of Execution & Interrogatories in Aid of Execution (DE # 8, 1/30/12). Rule 7.1(C), Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida provides, in pertinent part: Each party opposing a motion shall serve an opposing memorandum of law no later than ten days after service of the motion as computed in t
Summary: ORDER JOHN J. O'SULLIVAN, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion to Compel Response to Plaintiff's First Request for Production in Aid of Execution & Interrogatories in Aid of Execution (DE # 8, 1/30/12). Rule 7.1(C), Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida provides, in pertinent part: Each party opposing a motion shall serve an opposing memorandum of law no later than ten days after service of the motion as computed in th..
More
ORDER
JOHN J. O'SULLIVAN, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion to Compel Response to Plaintiff's First Request for Production in Aid of Execution & Interrogatories in Aid of Execution (DE # 8, 1/30/12). Rule 7.1(C), Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida provides, in pertinent part:
Each party opposing a motion shall serve an opposing memorandum of law no later than ten days after service of the motion as computed in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to do so may be deemed sufficient cause for granting the motion by default. (Emphasis supplied).
Having received no response from the defendant, and a response having been due, on February 21, 2012, the undersigned issued an Order (DE # 12) requiring the defendant to respond to the Motion to Compel Response to Plaintiff's First Request for Production in Aid of Execution & Interrogatories in Aid of Execution (DE # 8, 1/30/12) on or before March 6, 2012. As of the date of this Order, no response has been filed to the Motion to Compel Response to Plaintiff's First Request for Production in Aid of Execution & Interrogatories in Aid of Execution (DE # 8, 1/30/12). The defendant was warned in the February 21, 2012, Order that the failure to file a response to the Motion to Compel Response to Plaintiff's First Request for Production in Aid of Execution & Interrogatories in Aid of Execution (DE # 8, 1/30/12) may result in an Order that the Motion to Compel Response to Plaintiff's First Request for Production in Aid of Execution & Interrogatories in Aid of Execution (DE # 8, 1/30/12) be granted in its entirety. The February 21, 2012, Order was sent by Chambers to Teresa A. Alcala a/k/a Teresa A. Metts, 609 Van Ness Ave., Klamath Falls, OR 97601-1751. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to Compel Response to Plaintiff's First Request for Production in Aid of Execution & Interrogatories in Aid of Execution (DE # 8, 1/30/12)is GRANTED. The defendant shall respond to both the Plaintiff's First Request for Production in Aid of Execution and Interrogatories in Aid of Execution on or before March 27, 2012.
DONE AND ORDERED.
