Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WEINBERG v. ALLEY, 4:08cv480-MP-WCS. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20120323f22 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 19, 2012. (Doc. 90). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation
More

ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 19, 2012. (Doc. 90). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted, the defendants' motions for summary judgment should be denied, and this matter should be set for trial.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and incorporated herein.

2. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (docs. 48 and 81) are DENIED, and this matter shall be set for trial by separate order.

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer