HILL v. THE HOOVER COMPANY, 1:06cv96-SPM/GRJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120405a49
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 04, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2012
Summary: ORDER STEPHAN P. MICKLE, Senior District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay (doc. 67). Plaintiff's motion indicates that the parties have continued settlement negotiations, but have reached an impasse. Defendants do not oppose this motion (doc. 68). Because it appears that no further progress will be made through settlement negotiations at this time, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The Motion to Lift Stay (doc. 67) is granted. 2. On or before April 25
Summary: ORDER STEPHAN P. MICKLE, Senior District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay (doc. 67). Plaintiff's motion indicates that the parties have continued settlement negotiations, but have reached an impasse. Defendants do not oppose this motion (doc. 68). Because it appears that no further progress will be made through settlement negotiations at this time, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The Motion to Lift Stay (doc. 67) is granted. 2. On or before April 25,..
More
ORDER
STEPHAN P. MICKLE, Senior District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay (doc. 67). Plaintiff's motion indicates that the parties have continued settlement negotiations, but have reached an impasse. Defendants do not oppose this motion (doc. 68). Because it appears that no further progress will be made through settlement negotiations at this time, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The Motion to Lift Stay (doc. 67) is granted.
2. On or before April 25, 2012, Defendants shall file a response to the First Amended Complaint (doc. 1-3).
3. The parties shall conduct a new discovery planning meeting in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and shall submit a revised joint report on or before May 1, 2012.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
