Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WEYMOUTH v. ASTRUE, 3:11cv282/MCR/CJK. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20120405a56 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 04, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2012
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated March 12, 2012. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). An objection has been filed (doc. 10). The court has made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having
More

ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated March 12, 2012. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). An objection has been filed (doc. 10). The court has made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and the timely filed objections, the court has determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The application for a period of disability and disability benefits and for supplemental security income is DENIED and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer