Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. PAIR, 5:05cr26/MCR (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20120529671 Visitors: 19
Filed: May 25, 2012
Latest Update: May 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation filed on March 23, 2012. (Doc. 146). All parties have been furnished copies of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the report and reco
More

ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation filed on March 23, 2012. (Doc. 146). All parties have been furnished copies of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and defendant's objections thereto (doc. 147), I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 146) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant's Motion for Leave to Amend (doc. 145) is DENIED.

3. Defendant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (doc. 133) is DENIED.

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer