KELLER v. HINOTE, 1:11cv77-MP-GRJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120702748
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2012
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 31, 2012. (Doc. 31). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 31, 2012. (Doc. 31). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections ..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 31, 2012. (Doc. 31). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly:
1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Defendant Hinote's first motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute (doc. 26) is GRANTED. Defendant Hinote's second motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute (doc. 30) is DENIED as moot.
3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey an order of this Court.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
