THOMPSON v. TUCKER, 5:10cv186/MCR/EMT. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120717902
Visitors: 27
Filed: Jul. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2012
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 12, 2012 (doc. 38). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No timely objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, the court concludes that the Repor
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 12, 2012 (doc. 38). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No timely objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, the court concludes that the Report..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 12, 2012 (doc. 38). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No timely objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, the court concludes that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 23) is DENIED.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
