WELLS FARGO BANK NA v. BBMJ LLC, 1:11cv127-MP-GRJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120724804
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This matter is before the court on the plaintiff and defendants Brooking and KB 51's Joint Motion for an Order Requiring the Parties to Attend Mediation Within Sixty (60) Days (doc. 91) and Joint Motion for Telephonic Conference or Expedited Hearing (doc. 92). Defendants Johnson and Brooks, oppose the motions, while defendants Mohr and BBMJ take no position. The first mediation, held November 29, 2011, ended in impasse. Nevertheless, the court agr
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This matter is before the court on the plaintiff and defendants Brooking and KB 51's Joint Motion for an Order Requiring the Parties to Attend Mediation Within Sixty (60) Days (doc. 91) and Joint Motion for Telephonic Conference or Expedited Hearing (doc. 92). Defendants Johnson and Brooks, oppose the motions, while defendants Mohr and BBMJ take no position. The first mediation, held November 29, 2011, ended in impasse. Nevertheless, the court agre..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the plaintiff and defendants Brooking and KB 51's Joint Motion for an Order Requiring the Parties to Attend Mediation Within Sixty (60) Days (doc. 91) and Joint Motion for Telephonic Conference or Expedited Hearing (doc. 92). Defendants Johnson and Brooks, oppose the motions, while defendants Mohr and BBMJ take no position. The first mediation, held November 29, 2011, ended in impasse. Nevertheless, the court agrees that a second mediation conference may assist in the just and speedy resolution of this matter.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The joint motion for an order requiring the parties to attend mediation within sixty (60) days (doc. 91) is GRANTED.
2. This case is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones to conduct mediation on or before September 14, 2012.
3. The parties joint motion for telephonic conference or expedited hearing (doc. 92) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
